|
|
 |
| Published on March 19, 2010 |
|
CNY to LVL (Chinese Yuan Renminbi to Latvian Lats) Exchange Rates:
Charts and historical data
Last 10 working days

Last 30 days

Friday, March 19th: A second consecutive jump brought the Chinese yuan to Latvian lats quotation to 0.07654.
Thursday, March 18th: The upward movement restarted, the rate of exchange increasing by 0.00056.
Tuesday, March 16th - Wednesday, March 17th: The pair went down, reaching the 0.07538 level.
Monday, March 15th: The Chinese yuan to Latvian lats quotation increased to the 0.07564 level.
Wednesday, March 10th - Friday, March 12th: The exchange went down for three trading days in a row, reaching 0.07538 Latvian lati to the Chinese yuan on Friday, March 12th. This was the lowest level in five weeks.
Tuesday, March 9th: A major increase brought the CNY/LVL exchange to 0.07655.
Monday, March 8th: A 0.00051 decline brought the quote to 0.07595.
Friday, March 5th: The CNY/LVL quotation surged to 0.07646.
Wednesday, March 3rd - Thursday, March 4th: The downward trend continued for another two trading days; the Chinese yuan to Latvian lats exchange rate lost 0.00069, down to 0.076.
Tuesday, March 2nd: The Chinese yuan started to depreciate again against the Latvian currency; the quote went down to 0.07669, from 0.07681.
Monday, March 1st: The CNY/LVL exchange rate rose to the 0.07681 level.
Friday, February 26th: A significant decline brought the quote to 0.07656.
Tuesday, February 23rd - Thursday, February 25th: The CNY/LVL currency pair rose from 0.07625 to 0.07702, the highest reading in nine months.
Monday, February 22nd: The quotation dipped from 0.07677 to 0.07625.
Last 365 days

Since January 1999

CNY/LVL Exchange rate - Historical data:
|
| 2010-03-19 | 0.07654 | | 2010-03-18 | 0.07594 | | 2010-03-17 | 0.07538 | | 2010-03-16 | 0.07555 | | 2010-03-15 | 0.07564 | | 2010-03-12 | 0.07538 | | 2010-03-11 | 0.07594 | | 2010-03-10 | 0.07621 | | 2010-03-09 | 0.07655 | | 2010-03-08 | 0.07595 | | 2010-03-05 | 0.07646 | | 2010-03-04 | 0.076 | | 2010-03-03 | 0.07618 | | 2010-03-02 | 0.07669 | | 2010-03-01 | 0.07681 | | 2010-02-26 | 0.07656 | | 2010-02-25 | 0.07702 | | 2010-02-24 | 0.07669 | | 2010-02-23 | 0.07653 | | 2010-02-22 | 0.07625 | | 2010-02-19 | 0.07677 | | 2010-02-18 | 0.07648 | | 2010-02-17 | 0.07562 | | 2010-02-16 | 0.07598 | | 2010-02-15 | 0.0762 | | 2010-02-12 | 0.07646 | | 2010-02-11 | 0.07566 | | 2010-02-10 | 0.07556 | | 2010-02-09 | 0.0755 | | 2010-02-08 | 0.07593 | | 2010-02-05 | 0.07582 | | 2010-02-04 | 0.07501 | | 2010-02-03 | 0.07426 | | 2010-02-02 | 0.07448 | | 2010-02-01 | 0.07461 | | 2010-01-29 | 0.07433 | | 2010-01-28 | 0.07411 | | 2010-01-27 | 0.07369 | | 2010-01-26 | 0.07365 | | 2010-01-25 | 0.07332 | | 2010-01-22 | 0.07339 | | 2010-01-21 | 0.07382 | | 2010-01-20 | 0.07343 | | 2010-01-19 | 0.07268 | | 2010-01-18 | 0.07222 | | 2010-01-15 | 0.0722 | | 2010-01-14 | 0.07166 | | 2010-01-13 | 0.07131 | | 2010-01-12 | 0.07175 | | 2010-01-11 | 0.07152 | | 2010-01-08 | 0.07279 | | 2010-01-07 | 0.07263 | | 2010-01-06 | 0.07242 | | 2010-01-05 | 0.07195 | | 2010-01-04 | 0.0722 | | 2009-12-31 | 0.07212 | | 2009-12-30 | 0.07248 | | 2009-12-29 | 0.07195 | | 2009-12-28 | 0.07201 | | 2009-12-24 | 0.07209 | | 2009-12-23 | 0.07265 | | 2009-12-22 | 0.07262 | | 2009-12-21 | 0.07207 | | 2009-12-18 | 0.0722 | | 2009-12-17 | 0.07216 | | 2009-12-16 | 0.07107 | | 2009-12-15 | 0.07114 | | 2009-12-14 | 0.07065 | | 2009-12-11 | 0.07015 | | 2009-12-10 | 0.07033 | | 2009-12-09 | 0.07018 | | 2009-12-08 | 0.07016 | | 2009-12-07 | 0.07006 | | 2009-12-04 | 0.06876 | | 2009-12-03 | 0.06858 | | 2009-12-02 | 0.06873 | | 2009-12-01 | 0.06883 | | 2009-11-30 | 0.06911 | | 2009-11-27 | 0.0696 | | 2009-11-26 | 0.0689 | | 2009-11-25 | 0.06884 | | 2009-11-24 | 0.06936 | | 2009-11-23 | 0.06936 | | 2009-11-20 | 0.07002 | | 2009-11-19 | 0.06977 | | 2009-11-18 | 0.06939 | | 2009-11-17 | 0.06976 | | 2009-11-16 | 0.06933 | | 2009-11-13 | 0.06981 | | 2009-11-12 | 0.06956 | | 2009-11-11 | 0.06906 | | 2009-11-10 | 0.06937 | | 2009-11-09 | 0.06928 | | 2009-11-06 | 0.06989 | | 2009-11-05 | 0.06985 | | 2009-11-04 | 0.07036 | | 2009-11-03 | 0.07086 | | 2009-11-02 | 0.0703 | | 2009-10-30 | 0.07018 | | 2009-10-29 | 0.07022 | | 2009-10-28 | 0.07026 | | 2009-10-27 | 0.06982 | | 2009-10-26 | 0.06916 | | 2009-10-23 | 0.06913 | | 2009-10-22 | 0.06916 | | 2009-10-21 | 0.0696 | | 2009-10-20 | 0.06926 | | 2009-10-19 | 0.06952 | | 2009-10-16 | 0.06972 | | 2009-10-15 | 0.06983 | | 2009-10-14 | 0.06979 | | 2009-10-13 | 0.06987 | | 2009-10-12 | 0.0704 | | 2009-10-09 | 0.07046 | | 2009-10-08 | 0.0704 | | 2009-10-07 | 0.07067 | | 2009-10-06 | 0.07056 | | 2009-10-05 | 0.071 | | 2009-10-02 | 0.07138 | | 2009-10-01 | 0.07137 | | 2009-09-30 | 0.07082 | | 2009-09-29 | 0.0711 | | 2009-09-28 | 0.07057 | | 2009-09-25 | 0.07057 | | 2009-09-24 | 0.07017 | | 2009-09-23 | 0.06999 | | 2009-09-22 | 0.06992 | | 2009-09-21 | 0.07031 |
|
 |
| LATEST EXCHANGE RATES HEADLINES: |
|